检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈少梅[1] 周凤平[1] 朱远飞[1] 许贵珍[1] 刘明娜[1]
出 处:《河南中医》2013年第B04期75-76,共2页Henan Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨两种吸氧法对全麻病人鼻部手术鼻腔填塞后SpO2、舒适度及依从性影响。方法:40例施行全麻下鼻部手术鼻腔填塞后的患者,采用简易面罩法和双腔鼻导管口式法吸氧,比较两种吸氧方法对患者SpO2、舒适度及依从性的影响。结果:两种吸氧方法对患者SpO2均在95%以上,舒适度及依从性有统计学意义(P〈0.001)。结论:两种吸氧方法均能达到氧疗效果,双腔鼻导管口式法吸氧法可增加舒适度,提高吸氧治疗的依从性。Objective: Aim To explore the compliant effect of two oxygen methods for patients with nasal operations with overall anesthesia and their SpO2 and comfort. Methods: 40 cases of patients receiving nasal packing after operation on the nasal parts under overall anesthesia took oxygen in two ways., with masks and nasal double-current catheter. Comparison was made to see the influence of SpO2 ,comfort and compliance on the patients. Result: The patients had more 95%SpO2 of with both the two ways, and the comfort and compliance were statistically signifieant(P〈0. 001). Conclusion: Both the two ways couid produce the effect of oxygen therapy,but the nasal double-current catheter method eould increase patients' comfort and improve compliance of oxygen therapy.
分 类 号:R765.2[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30