机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院泌尿外科,北京100730
出 处:《中国男科学杂志》2013年第8期21-23,27,共4页Chinese Journal of Andrology
基 金:基金项目资助:本研究受“首都卫生发展科研专项项目(首发2011-2005-07)”资助
摘 要:目的了解目前国内经直肠前列腺活检术(TPB)围手术期预防性抗菌药物应用的现状。方法自2011年7月至9月,采用问卷调查方式对国内13个城市的34家教学医院进行调查,调查内容包括TPB围手术期是否应用抗菌药物、抗菌药物的种类、给药途径以及疗程。结果20家医院(58.8%)选择氟喹诺酮类药物作为预防用药,包括环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星、依诺沙星和莫西沙星;13家医院(38.2%)选择B内酰胺酶类抗菌药物,包括青霉素类(哌拉西林.舒巴坦、磺苄西林钠),二代头孢菌素(头孢唑啉、头孢呋辛、头孢呋肟),三代头孢菌素(头孢哌酮.舒巴坦、头孢曲松),1家(2.9%)医院应用大环内酯类(阿奇霉素),有2家(5.9%)医院同时加用抗厌氧菌药物(灭滴灵,奥硝唑)。给药途径方面有58.8%(20/34)的医院选择单纯静脉用药,有20.6%(7/34)的医院选择先静脉后口服的序贯疗法,20.6%(7/34)的医院选择单纯口服给药。用药时间:有5.9%(2/34)选择穿刺前3~5d开始用药,20.6%(7/34)选择穿刺前2d开始用药,38.2%(13/34)选择穿刺前1d开始用药,35.3%(12/34)选择穿刺当日开始用药。穿刺后第2天停药者占5.9%(2/34),穿刺后第3天停药者占29.4%(10/34),穿刺后第4天停药者占55.9%(19/34),穿刺后第4天以上停药者占8.8%(3/34)。有2家(5.9%)医院总预防用药时间长达10d。结论目前国内超声引导下TPB围手术期抗菌药物应用状况混乱,迫切需要大型多中心研究以规范TPB手术期抗菌药物的应用,作者提出了一些合理用药的规范。Objective To investigatecurrent situation of prophylactic antibiotics use in perioperative period of ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate biopsy performed. Methods From July 2011 to September, 2011, a face-to-face investigation, including judgement of antibiotics use in perioperative period of transrectal prostate biopsy, types of initial antibiotics, route of administration and course of antibiotic prophylaxis.were carried out in 34 teaching hospitals in 13 cities in China. Results Fluoroquinolones were selectedin 20 hospitals (58.8%) for initial prophylaxis, such as ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, enoxacin and moxifloxacin, and β-lactamases in,13 hospitals (38.2%) including penicillins (piperacillinsulbactam and sulbenicillin sodium), second-generation cephalosporins (cefazolin and cefuroxime) and third-generation cephalosporins (cefoperazone-sulbactam and ceftriaxone), macrolides (azithromycin) in 1 hospital(2.9%), and anti-anaerobic drugs (metronidazole and omidazole) in 2 hospital(5.9%)s. For route of administration, single intravenous administration was selected in 58.8% (20/34) hospitals selected, sequential intravenous and oral therapy in 20.6% (7/34) hospitals, and single oral administration in 20.6% (7/34) hospitals. For time of initial prophylaxis, onday3-5 before puncture were done in 5.9% (2/34) hospitals, on day2 before puncture in 20.6% (7/34) hospitals,on dayl before puncture in 38.2% (13/34) hospitals, and on puncture day in 35.3% (12/34) hospitals The drugs were administrated in all hospital on day 1 after puncture, the drugs were withdrawed in 5.9% (2/34) hospitals on day 2 after puncture, in 29.4% (10/34) hospitals on day 3 after puncture, in 55.9% (19/34) hospitals on day 4 after puncture, in 8.8% (3/34) hospitals on day 4+ after puncture. Time of drug use was over ten days in 2 (5.9%) hospitals. Conclusion The current situation of prophylactic antibiotics use in perioperative period of ultrasound-guided tra
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...