检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄蓉[1] 王辉[1] 王蕙[1] 南耀明 赵赫然[1] 段雅楠[1]
机构地区:[1]甘肃农业大学林学院,甘肃兰州730070 [2]定西市华家岭林业站,甘肃定西743000
出 处:《中国沙漠》2013年第6期1782-1788,共7页Journal of Desert Research
基 金:甘肃省高等学校研究生导师科研项目(1202-01)资助
摘 要:为探讨华家岭低效防护林带改造对土壤的改良效果,在华家岭地区选取生长不良的低效杨树纯林和改造后的云杉纯林、云杉×杨树、云杉×油松、云杉×落叶松混交林5种典型林带类型,对其土壤理化性状进行对比研究。结果表明:(1)云杉纯林及其混交林土壤的平均容重、平均毛管孔隙度、总孔隙度、通气度与杨树纯林的差异显著(p<0.05),经过低效林改造后的云杉纯林及其混交林较杨树纯林的土壤容重有所下降,孔隙度和通气性有所提高。(2)除速效P外,各林型的土壤速效N、速效K、全N、全P、全K和有机质含量随土层深度的增加而降低;云杉纯林及其混交林的土壤有机质含量、速效N、P、K和全量N、P、K养分均高于杨树纯林,pH值低于杨树纯林。(3)云杉纯林及其混交林的有机质含量和全N含量与容重和总孔隙度的相关性较杨树纯林的好,云杉纯林及其混交林对土壤理化性能的改良作用优于杨树纯林。In order to discuss the effect of low-efficient shelterbelts transformation on soil amelioration in Huajialing. The soil physicochemical properties were studied by choosing low-efficient Populus pure forest which grew badly and Picea asperata pure forest, Picea asperata Populus, Picea asperata Pinzs tabu- laetbrmis and Picea asperata Larix prncipis-rupprechtii which were transformation forest in the district of Huajialing. The results showed that: (1) Differences of soil mean bulk density, capillary porosity, total porosity and venting quality were significant between Picea asperata pure forest and its mixed forests and Pops pure forest. Compared with Poputus pure forest, after low-efficient transformation, the soil bulk density of Picea asperctta pure forest and its mixed forests were decreased to some extent, porosity and vent ability were improved. (2) The contents of soil available N, available K, total N, total P, total K and organic matter in forest types all decreased gradually with the increasing of soil depth except the available P. And the organic matter, available N, P, K and total N, P, K of Picea asperata pure forest and its mixed for ests were higher than Populus pure forest. PH of Populus pure forest was higher than Picea asperata pure forest and its mixed forests. (3) The correlations between soil organic matter, total N and soil bulk density, total porosity of Picea asperata pure forest and its mixed forests were better than Popdus pure forest. Amelioration effects of Picea asperata pure forest and its mixed forests on soil physicochemical properties were superior to Populus pure forest.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.227