机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学第二附属医院外三科,乌鲁木齐830063 [2]新疆医科大学第二附属医院南湖北社区服务中心,乌鲁木齐830063 [3]新疆医科大学第一附属医院,乌鲁木齐830011
出 处:《新疆医科大学学报》2013年第11期1673-1676,共4页Journal of Xinjiang Medical University
摘 要:目的探讨新疆塔城地区中学生急救能力及其影响因素,为少数民族地区中学生急救知识普及提供依据。方法随机选取新疆塔城地区托里县的1所汉语教学中学和1所双语教学中学,采用整群抽样方法抽取2所中学的1466名中学生作为研究对象,采用自编问卷对其进行现场调查,对不同性别、年龄、住址、学校、年级和经济收入的中学生的急救知识和危险标志认知得分差异及其影响因素进行比较。结果急救知识均分为(5.03±2.26)分,危险标志均分为(3.57±2.02)分。女生急救知识得分高于男生;11~15岁中学生的急救知识得分高于16~20岁中学生;农牧区中学生急救知识得分低于城镇中学生;双语教育中学生急救知识得分低于汉语教育中学生;初中生急救知识得分高于高中生;家庭经济收入越高的中学生急救知识得分越高,差异均有统计学意义(P均〈0.05)。农牧区中学生危险标志得分低于城镇中学生;双语教育中学生危险标志得分低于汉语教学中学生;家庭经济收入越高的中学生对危险标志认知得分越高,差异均有统计学意义(P均〈0.05)。多重线性回归分析表明,新疆塔城地区中学生急救知识得分影响因素为教学语言、正确性关注度、兴趣程度、需求程度和住址;危险标志识别得分影响因素为教学语言、住址、年级、年龄、需求程度和兴趣程度。结论新疆塔城地区中学生急救能力较低,应按照当地具体情况,针对不同教学语言和民族情况,采用相应的民族语言宣传方式,增强其对急救知识的兴趣和需求程度,提高其掌握急救能力的效率。Objective To investigate the first-aid ability and its influencing factors about the middle school students from Xinjiang Tacheng area, to provide a basis for minority middle school students in the first-aid ability. Methods A Chinese language teaching middle school and a bilingual teaching middle school were selected randomly in Toll County in Tacheng. 1466 middle school students were chosen as the research subjects given questionnaires for field investigations by the cluster sampling method. Results The average score of first-aid knowledge was (5.03±2.26), the average score of danger signs was (3.57±2.02). The score of girlsr first-aid knowledge was higher than that of boys'. 11--15 year-old middle school students in the score of first-aid knowledge was higher than the 16--20 year-old middle school students. The score of the students from agricultural and pastoral areas was lower than that of the urban areas. Bilingual students in the score of first-aid knowledge was lower than that of Chinese speaking students. The score of Junior middle school students in first-aid knowledge was higher than that of senior middle school students. The score of higher income family was higher than that of lower income family in first-aid knowledge. Differ- ences were statistically significant (P 〈0.05). The score of danger signs of students from agricultural and pastoral areas was lower than that of the urban areas; Bilingual stuctents in the score of danger signs was lower than that of Chinese speaking students; The higher income family had the higher score of danger signs. Differences were statistically significant (P 〈0. 05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the influencing factors in the score of first aid knowledge were: the language of instruction, the correctness of concern, the level of interest, the extent of demand and address; the influencing factors in the score of danger signs were- the language of instruction, address, grade, age, extent of demand and the level of in- teres
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...