没收较大数额财产中听证程序之介入时机研究——基于行政强制措施与行政处罚的连结  

On Intervention Time of Hearing Procedure in Confiscation of Large Amount of Property——Based on Combination of Administrative Coercive Measure and Administrative Punishment

作　　者：韩宁[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2013年第4期90-95,共6页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

摘　　要：指导案例第6号指出,实施没收较大数额财产处罚需根据《行政处罚法》第42条适用听证程序。没收较大数额财产时,有时需要先实施扣押等行政强制措施、再作出处罚决定;前者为强制措施阶段,后者为处罚决定阶段。取缔是连结上述两个阶段的典型。在强制措施与没收的对象同一时,相关法律规范对听证程序于强制措施阶段提早介入预留了空间,但从典型案例来看,法院严格控制在处罚决定阶段适用听证程序,遑论使听证程序在强制措施阶段介入。The guiding case No.6 points out that the implementation of large amount of property confiscation punishment should apply to the hearing procedure according to Article 42 of the Administrative Punishment Law. When large amount of property is confiscated, sometimes administrative coercive measures such as distraining need to be first implemented then the punishment decision; the former is the coercive measure stage, while the latter is the punishment decision stage. Banning is typical in combining the above two stages. When the objects of the coercive measure and confiscation are the same, relevant legal norms reserve space for hearing procedure＇s intervening in advance in the coercive measure stage. However, seen from the typical cases, application of hearing procedure is strictly controlled by the court to intervene in the punishment decision stage, let alone in the coercive measure stage.

关 键 词：没收较大数额财产 行政强制措施 取缔 听证程序 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]