检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:部瑞梅[1]
机构地区:[1]中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司,西安710043
出 处:《铁道标准设计》2013年第12期47-49,53,共4页Railway Standard Design
摘 要:以改建西安至安康铁路增建第二线工程地质灾害危险性评估为例,通过在综合评估量化评分方法的应用实践,对评估因子的选取和分级取值、危险性等级划分和各级分值范围确定、评分方法和步骤等方面进行探讨。结果表明,在量化评分方法基础上,对地质灾害危险性分区能够较好地反映多因素的综合影响,使综合评估结论更加符合实际。The risk evaluation of geological hazard for the project of supplemented second line of redeveloped Xi'an-Ankang Railway was taken as the example in this thesis. And then, in combination with the actual experiences on comprehensive evaluation with the quantitative scoring method, a series of issues were analyzed, such as the choice and classification of the evaluation factors, the grading and scoring at all levels of risks, the scoring method and procedure, etc. The analysis results show that if the risks of geological hazards were zoned based on the quantitative scoring method, the comprehensive influences of muhiple factors would be better reflected and the conclusion of comprehensive evaluation would be much more in accordance with the actual.
分 类 号:U212.22[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117