妇幼机构开展婴幼儿心理保健的实证研究  

Empirical study for women and children institutions of infant mental health

作　　者：蒋宗顺 刘柳英 卢红[2] 廖立红 倪海燕 唐顺利 王龙[2] 

机构地区：[1]广西壮族自治区柳州市第二妇幼保健院医务科,545007 [2]广西科技大学职业技术教育学院职业教育教研室 [3]广西壮族自治区柳州市第二妇幼保健院儿科,545007 [4]广西壮族自治区柳州市第二妇幼保健院儿童保健科,545007

出　　处：《中华全科医师杂志》2013年第11期901-903,共3页Chinese Journal of General Practitioners

摘　　要：采用1∶1配对法获取试验组与对照组,将样本中正常者列为发展性研究组（242对）,将边缘与轻度发育迟缓者列为征兆性研究组（156对）,通过为期10个月的团体式和个案式干预,从考察Gesell测试的大运动、精细运动、适应能力、言语、个人-社交5个能区的发育商在组内、组间比较的差异显著性水平决断干预的有效性.无论是发展性干预组还是征兆性干预组,其试验组的发育商在大运动、精细运动、适应能力、言语、个人-社交5个能区方面均优于对照组水平也优于干预前的自我水平.The samples of experimental and control groups were obtained by 1 ∶ 1 matching method and divided into development （242 pairs） and sign （156 pairs） groups.Through a 10-month group and case type intervention,Gesell test was performed for 5 zone development quotients of large motor,fine motor,adaptability,speech and personal-social to determinate the effectiveness of interventions.Before intervention,t values of the development group were 1.07,1.42,0.78,0.62 and 1.67 while those of sign group-1.48,-1.96,1.82,1.78 and-1.73 respectively.The inter-group comparison of various developmental quotient differences had no statistical significance （P ＞ 0.05）.After intervention,t values of the development group were 9.85,8.92,3.57,11.21 and 9.30 for inter-group comparison and-31.65,-36.94,-46.26,-37.56 and-49.85 for intra-group comparison.The results of sign group were 10.91,9.61,10.75,12.01 and 14.36 for inter-group comparison and-23.20,-31.75,-44.94,-33.58 and-54.58 for intra-group comparison.Between intra-group and inter-group,the comparison of the developmental quotient differences had statistical significance （P ＜ 0.01）.In two experimental groups,the post-intervention developmental quotients in 5 zones are better than those pre-intervention levels.It shows that preventive intervention of infant mental health is effective.

关 键 词：儿童心理学 妇幼保健中心 

分 类 号：R174[医药卫生—妇幼卫生保健]