禁止不利变更原则在行政处罚论域中的扩张适用  

On Expanding Application of Prohibition of Adverse Alteration Principle in Administrative Punishment

作　　者：石珍 戴乔 

机构地区：[1]深圳市市场监督管理局,广东深圳518000 [2]重庆市大渡口区人民法院,重庆大渡口400000

出　　处：《重庆三峡学院学报》2013年第6期137-141,共5页Journal of Chongqing Three Gorges University

摘　　要：行政救济实为有权机关在行政机关首次适用法律之后所实施的第二次适法行为,其本身亦符合"上诉审"之性质。故刑罚中的"上诉不加刑"应当逐渐援引至行政救济程序中,以防止对受处罚者的二次伤害。只是在行政法论域中,"上诉不加刑原则"被修辞成了"禁止不利变更原则"。基于保障公民寻求救济之基本权利、限制处罚权之滥用、维护政府信用的需要,无论是行政处罚程序,还是行政处罚复议程序,亦或是行政处罚诉讼程序,有权机关均不得因当事人的申诉或抗辩而加重该当事人的行政责任。Administrative remedies are the administrative organ＇s second time to apply the law behind the initial implementation of the law, which also accord the appellate property. So, ＂Appeal not infliction＂ should be used in administrative remedies gradually. This can prevent the second injury for the people who has been published. In the field of Administrative law, ＂Appeal not infliction＂ is called ＂Prohibition of Adverse Alteration＂ If the parties appeal or counterplead, competent authorities can not increase the administrative responsibility of the parties in the administrative penalty procedures, administrative penalty review procedure or administrative penalty proceedings based on the rights of citizens to seek redress and the demands of limiting punishment abuse and maintenance of ~overnment credit.

关 键 词：上诉不加刑 禁止不利变更 行政救济程序 

分 类 号：D922.11[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]