检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南开大学信息资源管理系
出 处:《中国图书馆学报》2013年第6期9-26,共18页Journal of Library Science in China
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目"信息贫困与脱贫机制的整体性研究"(项目编号:70673040)和"信息不平等的发生机理和政策启示研究"(项目编号:71273141)的研究成果之一
摘 要:本文以已有研究揭示的农村居民信息劣势以及现有理论对这一劣势的解释局限为背景,试图通过对我国农民信息获取机会的跨历史时期(历时性)和跨领域考察,发展现有信息不平等理论。按照结构分析的思路,本文以相关历史研究成果、统计资料和政策文本为依据,考察了新中国成立以来,农民信息获取机会的变化及其与已知的结构性因素的关联,显示了已知结构性因素无法解释的变化和差异。研究发现,现有理论可以解释城乡在可比指标上的差距,但很难解释农村不同信息设施/服务/资源间的内部差异及时间序列上的变异;要理解这些差异,需要把国家及其构建的权力关系和市场架构作为影响农民信息获取机会的核心因素。本研究根据这一发现并借鉴O'Connar的新国家理论重新阐释了我国农民的信息劣势。图4。表2。参考文献56。Based on previous research findings that rural residents are generally disadvantaged in information access and against the limitation of existing theories in explaining this disadvantage, this paper aims to develop existing theories through a historical and comparative analysis of Chinese peasants' information access. Following the tradition of structural analysis, this study takes existing historical studies, statistics and government policies as evidence and examines the relationship between peasants' information access and the structural factors identified by existing theories. It has revealed some patterns of variations in peasants' information access that cannot be explained by existing theories, and finds that in order to understand these variations, the structural theory of peasants' information access needs to place the state and the power and market structures as defined by the state, at its centre. This paper concludes by explicating this theory in light of O'Connar's new theory of the state. 4 figs. 2 tabs. 56 refs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.190.154.24