检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔秀芹[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏商贸职业学院管理系,江苏南通226011
出 处:《吉林省经济管理干部学院学报》2013年第5期28-31,136,共4页Journal of Jilin Province Economic Management Cadre College
基 金:江苏省教育厅2012年度高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目(2012SJB790040)
摘 要:针对房价上涨过快现象,我国自2003年起对房地产市场进行了持续的宏观调控,调控政策对房地产企业的盈利能力产生了影响。通过对每股收益、净资产收益率和营业利润率等指标进行实证分析,发现江苏房地产上市公司的盈利能力在持续调控期间基本保持稳定,偶有短期波动。调控使得房地产开发企业的成本增加,但持续上涨的房价却使得企业的营业收入增加得更多,因此,盈利能力并未受到太多的影响。尽管如此,江苏房地产上市公司还应该认识到其与万科地产等国内知名企业的差距,采取措施进一步提升自己的盈利能力。In view of the soaring housing prices, our country has carried out continuous macroeconomic regulation and control on real estate market since 2003 and control policies have had an impact on the profitability of real estate companies. Through empirical analysis of EPS,ROE and OPR,we found that the profitability of listed real estate companies in Jiangsu remained stable with occasional short-term fluctuations during the continuous regulation. The regulation made the cost of real estate companies raised, but the continuous rise in housing prices made business income increased even more, therefore, profitability has not been too much influenced. Nevertheless, Jiangsu listed real estate companies should also be aware of the gap with Vanke and other well-known domestic enterprises, and take measures to enhance their profitability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.182.74