检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邴昊阳 张艳[1] 贾志宽[1] 陈馨[1] 吴杨[1]
机构地区:[1]西北农林科技大学中国旱区节水农业研究院/农业部旱地作物生理生态与耕作重点开放实验室,陕西杨凌712100
出 处:《灌溉排水学报》2013年第5期30-33,共4页Journal of Irrigation and Drainage
基 金:“十二五”国家科技支撑计划课题(2012BAD09B03,2011BAD29B09);国家863课题(2013AA102902,2011AA100504);公益性行业专项(201303104);陕西科技创新项目(2011NXC01-16)
摘 要:以春玉米为供试材料,以传统灌溉方式为对照,研究集雨节灌对土壤水分和作物产量的影响。结果表明,集雨节灌处理下土壤含水率较沟灌、畦灌、沟垄集雨种植分别提高0.58%~1.74%、4.55%~5.14%、3.21%~6.48%。集雨节灌各处理下产量和水分利用效率均高于对应沟灌、畦灌、沟垄集雨种植处理,其中产量分别提高5.03%~15.45%、14.57%~21.85%、2.32%~5.72%,水分利用效率分别提高28.41%~40.23%、39.58%~54.70%、2.99%~5.09%。Spring corn was taken as the material to study the effects of rainfall harvesting planting combined with water-saving irrigation (RHWI) on soil moisture and yield of spring corn with the traditional irrigation modes of furrow irrigation and border irrigation as the control. The results showed that the soil moisture under RHWI increased by 0. 58% - 1. 74%, 4.55% - 5.14%, 3.21% - 6.48% compared to those under furrow irrigation, furrow border irrigation and planting of rainfall harvesting (PRH), respectively. The average yield and water use efficiency (WUE) under RHWI were higher 5.03%-15.45%, 14.57% - 21.85%, 2.32% -5. 72% and 28.41% -40.23%, 39.58%- 54.70%, 2.99%- 5.09% than those under furrow irrigation, border irrigation and PRH.
分 类 号:S274.1[农业科学—农业水土工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38