检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:仪喜峰[1]
出 处:《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第6期36-43,共8页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基 金:教育部2013年度人文社科研究青年项目(13YJC820095);2014年度上海市教委科研创新项目(14YS048);中国海洋发展研究中心科研项目(AOCQN201316)
摘 要:西方海权理论带有浓重的海洋霸权色彩。中国海权是海洋主权、海洋权利和制海权的统一,具有自卫性和有限性。我国海权的法律保护存在宪法关注缺失、立法相对滞后及体系不平衡等缺陷。海洋战略是一项基本国策,具有重大的宪法价值。宪法保护海权有其必要性,解决海岛海洋争端和提升我国海洋执法的正当性均需宪法提供明确的依据。十八大报告为海权入宪创造了契机,可通过增设涉海条款和授权普通法律来保护海权。Western theories of sea power are endowed with a strong maritime hegemony. Chinese sea power, as the unity of the marine sovereignty and sea rights and command of the sea, is featured with self- defense and limited. The legal protection of the sea power in our country still has such problems as lack of constitutional coneem, lagging in legislation and unbalanced system. It's of necessity to involve constitution in the protection of sea power, which is beneficial to solve disputes on islands and waters and enhance the justifi- cation and legitimacy of the Marine law. The eighteen report of the Communist Party of China has created the opportunity for the sea right into the constitution, specifically to add marine clauses as direct protection and to empower common laws as indirect protection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.140.120