检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华北电力大学经济管理系,河北保定071003
出 处:《电力学报》2013年第5期441-445,共5页Journal of Electric Power
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(编号:70671039)~~
摘 要:为缓解我国的煤电紧张关系,国内学者对我国的煤电关系进行了大量的理论和实证研究。从市场势力的角度构建了理论模型,通过四种不同的市场结构对我国的煤、电企业的利益分配以及社会福利损失进行了研究。理论模型证明只有当煤炭企业和电力企业都实行市场化竞争时才能实现市场均衡,社会福利才能得到最优配置,最后提出了相关建议。To relieve the strain relationship between Chi- na's coal enterprises and electric power enterprises, domestic scholars have a lot of theoretical and empirical studies on the relationship between China's coal enterprises and electric power enterprises. This paper from the point of market forces to build a theoretical model to study the benefits distribution and social welfare of China's coal enterprises and power enterprises through four different market structures. The study fmds that on- ly when the coal enterprises and electric power enterprises are competitive enterprises can realize the equilibrium in the mar- ket, and to get the optimal allocation of social welfare. Finally, policy recommendations are offered according to the analysis of this study.
分 类 号:TM715[电气工程—电力系统及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.164.190