卢卡奇“总体性辩证法”与阿多诺“否定的辩证法”的内在关联与区别  

Differences and Internal Association between Lukacs' s “Totality Dialectics” and Adorno's “Negative Dialectics”

作　　者：高原[1] 李盼[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学哲学院,天津300071

出　　处：《廊坊师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2013年第5期115-118,共4页Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：学界一直将阿多诺"否定的辩证法"与卢卡奇"总体性辩证法"完全对立起来,这其实在某种程度上是对阿多诺"否定的辩证法"的一种片面化的误读,并没有结合当时社会历史实际环境来深入探讨阿多诺理论背后所隐含的深意,以及他与卢卡奇"总体性辩证法"的内在深刻联系。阿多诺"否定的辩证法"实质上是对卢卡奇"总体性辩证法"的一种回归和提升,由于两人所面临的社会历史环境不同,所以才产生了貌似对立但却殊途同归的理论形态。从两人所处时代背景、两人代表理论的实质内涵及阿多诺对卢卡奇"总体性辩证法"的批判等不同角度可以看出二人理论的内在联系及其对马克思主义辩证法的深刻阐发与推动。Academic circles regard the Adorno＇s ＂Negative Dialectics＂ and Lukacs＇s ＂Totality Dialectics＂ as complete opposition. The author believes that this is in fact a kind of misunderstanding of Adorno＇ s ＂Negative Dialectics＂, not relating to the social history of the actual environment when exploring the meaning implied Adorno＇s theory and the internal association between Adorno＇s and Lukacs＇s theory. In essence, ＂Negative Dialectics＂ is a regression and promotion of Lukacs＇s ＂Totality dialectic＂; as they were facing different social and historical environment, they produced seemingly opposing theories but similar in essence. The background of the times they lived, the substance of their theories, Adorno＇s criticism of Lukacs＇s ＂Totality Dialectics＂ can explain the internal relations of the two theories of Marxist dialectics profound exposition and promotion.

关 键 词：卢卡奇 物化 总体性辩证法 否定的辩证法 星丛 

分 类 号：B089.1[哲学宗教—哲学理论]