检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:夏正远[1] 史昕云[1] WillemFlameng 夏中元[1]
机构地区:[1]湖北医科大学附属第一医院湖北省人民医院麻醉科,湖北武汉430060 [2]比利时鲁汶大学(K.U.Leuven)医学院
出 处:《中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志》2000年第4期254-256,共3页Chinese Journal of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology
摘 要:远端器官缺血性预处理 (RPC)可减少缺血再灌注后心肌坏死范围。本研究旨在观察RPC对缺血再灌注心脏不同部位血流及心律失常发生率的影响。方法 :19头成年绵羊随机分为对照组 (n =9)及RPC组 (n =10 )。RPC组动物接受 3次左侧股动脉阻断 (5min)及再灌注 (5min) ,随后两组动物均分别依次阻断左冠状动脉前降支 (LAD) 10min ,再灌注 10min ;左冠状动脉第一分支 (D1)阻断及再灌注 10min后阻断左旋支 (LCX) 10min ,再灌注后观察 12 0min。结果 :LCX再灌注 10min时RPC组左室心内膜前壁、间隔及心外膜间隔心肌血流量 (分别为 0 .86± 0 .2 7,1.10±0 .34及 1.2 0± 0 .5 1ml·min-1·g-1)显著高于对照组 (分别为 0 .6 4± 0 .2 8,0 .6 9± 0 .2 3及 0 .5 8± 0 .2 6ml·min-1·g-1) ,P <0 .0 5。RPC显著减少再灌注后心室纤颤的发生率 (对照组 8/ 9,RPC组 2 / 10 ,P <0 .0 1)。冠状动脉阻断及再灌注后对照组主动脉平均压低于RPC组 ,但差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论 :RPC显著减少心肌缺血及再灌注期心室纤颤的发生 ,其机制可能与RPC显著改善心内膜血液供应有关。Remote organ ischemic preconditioning (RPC) may reduce heart infarct size following myocardium ischemia and reperfusion.We aim to observe the effects of RPC on regional myocardial blood flow (MBF) and ischemic arrhythmia after consecutive coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion.19 adult sheep were randomly divided into control group (Group C, n =9) and remote preconditioning group (Group RPC, n =10).Animals in RPC group received 3 episodes of 5 min occlusion and 5 min reperfusion of the left iliac artery.After that,10 min occlusion followed by 10 min reperfusion of the left anterior descending (LAD),the first diagonal (D 1) and the left circumflex (LCX) coronary arteries were performed consecutively in all animals.MBF was measured with colored microspheres.Results:10 min after LCX reperfusion,MBF in the anterior and septal endocardium as well as in the septal epicardium of left ventricle in group RPC (0.86 ±0.27,1.10±0.34,and 1.20±0.51 ml·min -1 ·g -1 respectively) were significantly higher than the corresponding values in group C (0.64±0.28,0.69±0.23 and 0.58±0.26 ml·min -1 ·g -1 respectively) ( P <0.05).8 sheep in group C (8/9) and 2 sheep in group RPC (2/10) developed ventricular fibrillation after coronary reperfusion ( P <0.01,group C vs group RPC).Mean aortic blood pressure in group C was lower than that in group RPC during coronary occlusion and reperfusion,but the difference did not reach statistic significance ( P >0.05).Conclusion:RPC improves myocardial blood flow and reduces post ischemic arrhythmia after coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion,which may have potential clinical significance.
分 类 号:R541.405[医药卫生—心血管疾病] R541.701[医药卫生—内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49