走向建构:实在论还是后人类主义?——建构的结构实在论与“力量之舞”的比较研究  

Turning to Construction: Realism or Post- humanism——A Comparative Study of Constructive Structural Realism and the Dance of Agency

作　　者：周理乾[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学哲学系,南京210093

出　　处：《科学技术哲学研究》2013年第6期1-6,共6页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology

摘　　要：皮克林的"冲撞理论"和曹天予的建构的结构实在论是整体论挑战后很有代表性的理论,但这两种理论在根本上完全对立。首先是社会调查的方法与坚持概念史为基础的方法的对立,其次是理论本质的对立,这主要表现为四方面,本体论的地位、科学发展中有无中心、理论建构过程的实在性以及向未来开放的理论。两者的理论都有很大的启发性,不过要想更好地解决科学哲学的传统问题,或许还需要曹天予所说的"本体论的综合"。The mangle theory proposed by Pickering and the theory of constructive structural realism proposed by Cao are representative theories after Holism Challenge. In fact, they are fundamentally oppsite. The first opposition is between the method of social survey and the method which insists on the basis of concept history. The second oppo- sition lies in the essence of theories, which can be shown in four aspects：the position of ontology, whether or not there is a center in the development of science, the reality of the theory construction process and whether or not the theory is open to the future. Although both theories are instructive, if we want to solve the traditional question in phi- losophy,we may need to achieve ＂ontological svnthesis＂ nrnnng^d hv Can Ti^n -v,,

关 键 词：建构 冲撞 结构实在论 去中心 

分 类 号：N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]