论以非自有财产出资行为的法律效力——兼论《公司法》司法解释(三)第七条的具体适用  

On the Legal Effect of Non-self-owned Property Investment——With Reference to Article 7 of the Judicial Interpretation(Ⅲ)of the Company Law

作　　者：翟云岭[1] 曲佳[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学法学院,辽宁大连116026

出　　处：《辽宁大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第6期120-126,共7页Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：出资人以非自有财产出资属于未全面履行出资义务之行为。如何认定以非自有财产出资行为的法律效力以及如何纠正这种非正常的公司资本状态,直接关系到公司资本的维持和债权人的保护问题,同时又关系到第三人和公司之间的利益平衡问题。《公司法》司法解释(三)第七条认定了公司构成善意取得的以第三人财产出资行为以及以违法犯罪所得的货币出资行为的法律效力。但是,仅凭上述两款规定无法展现以非自有财产出资行为效力问题的全貌,因而有必要构建以非自有财产出资行为效力研究的完整体系,全面分析各种非自有财产出资行为的法律效力。Investment with non-self-owned property is regarded as failure to fulfill investment obliga- tions. How to determine the legal effect of non-self-owned property investment and how to rectify this abnormal status of company capital, have close relationship with the capital maintenance and the creditor protection, and also the balancing of interest between the third-party and the company. Article 7 of the Judicial In- terpretation（ III ）of the Company Law confirms the validity of investment with third-party-owned property under company bona fide acquisition, .and also the validity of investment with money from illegal or criminal activities. However, we cannot have a complete picture of the legal effect of non-self-owned investment from the regulations of Article 7. Therefore, there is great necessity to build a complete system of study on the legal effect of non-self-owned investment, and conduct thorough analysis on the legal effect of various kinds of non＇-self-owned investment.

关 键 词：非自有财产 股东出资 善意取得 

分 类 号：D923.99[政治法律—民商法学]