论运动训练分期理论与板块周期的关系  

Relationship between Periodical Training Theory and Block Periodization

作　　者：胡海旭[1] 邱锴[2] 李恩荆[3] 杜长亮[4] 张婉[1] 陈世[1] 杜翔[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京体育大学研究生院,北京100084 [2]南京邮电大学体育部,江苏南京210023 [3]华中师范大学体育学院,湖北武汉430079 [4]南京航空航天大学体育部,江苏南京210016

出　　处：《上海体育学院学报》2013年第6期90-96,共7页Journal of Shanghai University of Sport

基　　金：国家体育总局重点领域研究课题(2012B070);中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助课题(2012BS016)

摘　　要：运动训练分期理论区别于单一的训练问题,是对运动训练的整体性规律和长期训练过程组织的研究。它以马特维耶夫为代表的苏联学者始创于20世纪60年代,70年代正式传入西方并发展至今。20世纪80年代以来质疑者提出板块周期。通过对极具代表性的英文文献的纵向研究认为:就某种程度而言板块周期是训练分期理论中的一种最优化的中周期模式,而赛前中周期更类似于板块周期;运动训练分期理论强调通过一体化方式,逻辑、系统、有序地组织运动训练各要素,以使运动员适时出现高峰竞技状态;板块周期则强调高度专项化集中安排训练负荷。Different from other theories to deal with one single training problem, periodical training theory concerns the discipline of entire training and the organization of long-period training. This theory was founded by the Soviet scholar Matveyev in 1960s and was brought into western countries in 1970s. In 1980s, some doubters put forward block periodization. A longitudinal study of representative English literature, in this paper, indicates that block periodization is one optimal mesocycle mode of periodical training theory; whereas the mesocycle of pre-competition is more similar to block periodization. Periodical training theory focuses more on the logical and systematic sequencing of training factors in an integrative way in order for an athlete to reach his peak on certain occasions; while block periodization pays more attention to specialized-and-intensified training load.

关 键 词：运动训练分期理论 板块周期 高峰竞技状态 中周期 训练效应 

分 类 号：G808.1[文化科学—体育训练]