检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《河北法学》2013年第11期76-84,共9页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:监所事件频发,社会舆论将矛头直指监所监督,实现监所监督的首要前提是主体的确定及相互关系的协调。依据我国权力结构,监督主体有人大、行政监察机关、检察机关。作为可以与监所抗衡的权力主体,本应发挥监督作用,遏制、减少监所事件的发生,但实际效果却不然。在现有权力框架内,究竟如何才能有效发挥三者在监所监督中的作用,有必要从理论上对三个监督主体分析,明确彼此之间的关系。从而试图构建良性的监所监督主体体系,以保障被监管人员在失去自由时不至于丧失人权。In view of the frequent prison events, social public opinion point to prisonsupervision. Identification of the main body and coordination of the relationship is the first premise of supervision to realize supervision. Based on our country's power framework, supervision body include National People "s Congress,administrative supervision organs,procuratorial organs. As the rival power in power system,it should play a role of supervision in containing or reducing the occurrence of event. But its not actual effect. How do them play the role in Prison supervision, and what is the relationship between them . The theoretical exploration of these body in the power framework is of great significance. Based on the analysis ,we should build a benign supervision system to guarantee the freedom as a person when he is lose his freedom by regular.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117

