国际合同法律适用中“意思自治原则”的晚近发展——《海牙国际合同法律选择原则》述评  

Latest Developments of Party Autonomy for Law Choice in International Contracts: Comment on Hague Principles on the Choice of Law in International Contracts

作　　者：刘仁山[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院

出　　处：《环球法律评论》2013年第6期146-157,共12页Global Law Review

基　　金：作者主持的2011年度国家社科基金重点项目<〈涉外民事关系法律适用法〉实施问题研究>(编号:11AFX016)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：海牙国际私法会议于2012年通过的《海牙国际合同法律选择原则》(《海牙原则》),反映出意思自治原则在合同法律适用问题上的最新发展。《海牙原则》表明,意思自治原则在国际合同领域的地位进一步得到彰显,当事人的选法自由得到充分尊重;优先性强制规则与公共政策构成对意思自治原则的实质性限制,成为适用该原则的例外。换言之,《海牙原则》在意思自治原则上形成了强化自由与例外规制的基本格局。以《海牙原则》为参照,我国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》及其司法解释关于意思自治原则的规定尚待进一步完善。Hague Principles on the Choice of Law in International Contracts （ Hague Prin- ciples） drafted by The Hague Conference on Private International Law represents the latest devel- opment in the field of contractual conflict of laws. The Hague Principles emphasizes on the princi- ple of party autonomy of international contracts. On one hand, the parties＇ freedom of choice of law has been fully respected in order to highlight the status of the principle of party autonomy in the field of international contracts. On the other hand, overriding mandatory rules and public poli- cy are the two substantial exceptions to the principle of party autonomy. Generally speaking, the Hague Principles has formulated the basic structure which consists of strengthening freedom as the principle and certain restrictions as the exception. Taking the Hague Principles as the reference in Laws to Foreign-Related Civil Relations 2010 and its Judicial Interpretation still needs further ex- planation for proper application.

关 键 词：《海牙国际合同法律选择原则》 意思自治原则 强制性规则 公共秩序 

分 类 号：D997.1[政治法律—国际法学]