检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈亚芳[1] 方剑乔[1] 陈勤[2] 方莉[2] 孙晶[1] 董巍[1] 罗培[1] 张璐[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江中医药大学,杭州310053 [2]浙江中医药大学附属第三医院,杭州310005
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2013年第11期951-953,共3页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
基 金:国家中医药管理局中医药标准化课题资助项目[ZYYS-2010(0044)-3];浙江省"重中之重"学科资助项目[浙教高科(2008)255号]
摘 要:目的采用CONSORT和STRICTA标准对针灸治疗原发性三叉神经痛随机对照试验的报告质量进行评价,探讨提高针灸临床随机对照试验质量的方法。方法运用计算机与手工检索相结合的方式对国内外相关医学文献数据库及学术刊物进行检索,筛选出符合研究标准的试验,并采用CONSORT声明和STRICTA标准对其进行质量评价。语种限制为中文和英文。结果在纳入的66篇研究中,大部分均存在无基线资料、随机方法描述不清、无随机隐藏、未使用盲法、无样本量计算、无意向性治疗分析、针刺细节报道不充分等问题。结论目前针灸治疗三叉神经痛的随机对照试验报告质量普遍较低,影响其可靠性和同质可比性。今后应加大力度提倡采用国际公认的CONSORT声明和STRICTA标准对针灸疗法的随机对照试验进行规范报告。Objective To evaluate the quality of the randomized controlled trials on acupuncture-moxibustion in treating primary trigeminal neuralgia by using CONSORT and STRICTA standards, and to discuss how to improve the quality of the randomized controlled clinical trials on acupuncture-moxibustion. Method Eligible literatures were retrieved by computer and hand from the relevant databases and academic journals both at home and abroad, and then undergone estimation by using CONSORT and STR1CTA standards. The publication languages were limited to be Chinese or English. Result Among the 66 included trials, the majority were short of baseline information, with vague description of randoraized method, short of random consealment, blinding method, sample size calculation, intention-to-treat analysis, and lacked of the details of acupuncture operation. Conclusion Generally speaking, the current randomized controlled clinical trials on acupuncture-moxibustion for trigeminal neuralgia had relevantly low quality, which affected the reliability and comparability.
关 键 词:三叉神经痛 随机对照试验 质量评价 CONSORT STRICTA
分 类 号:R246.6[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222