检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《药物分析杂志》2013年第11期1995-2000,共6页Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis
摘 要:目的:对市场上出现的土牛膝混淆品进行鉴定,并建立土牛膝及其混淆品的性状及显微鉴别方法。方法:在植物分类学鉴定的基础上,对土牛膝的混淆品广东土牛膝进行鉴定,并使用性状与显微的研究方法,对采集及市场上收集土牛膝及广东土牛膝样品进行比较分析。结果:通过研究发现,土牛膝与广东土牛膝可以通过性状、根横切面及粉末的显微特征进行区分,两者区别明显。结论:土牛膝与广东土牛膝可以通过性状、显微等方面进行鉴别;通过对两者性状、显微的细致研究,为相关标准的修订及提高提供依据。To identify adulterant species of Radix et Rhizoma Achyranthis Asperae found in the market and establish methods for morphological and histological identification of Radix et Rhizoma Achyranthis Asperae and its adulterant species. Methods: Based on plant taxonomy, the adulterant species of Radix et Rhizoma Achyranthis Asperae was identified;based on morphological and microscopic research, samples of Radix et Rhizoma Achyranthis Asperae and Radix Eupatorii Chinensis collected from the field and the market were compared. Results: The mor- phological and microscopic differences between Radix et Rhizoma Achyranthis Asperae and Radix Eupatorii Chinen- sis were obvious and could be distinguished according to their properties, transverse section of root and microscopic characteristics. Conclusion: Radix et Rhizoma Achyranthis Asperae and Radix Eupatorii Chinensis can be identi- fied by comparing their morphology and microscopic structures, and the results provide evidence for revision and perfection of related standards.
分 类 号:R917[医药卫生—药物分析学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.113