检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王树俊[1] 曹新广[2] 方立峰[1] 王晓霞[1] 陈宏超[1] 张普选[1]
机构地区:[1]郑州市第一人民医院消化内科,450004 [2]河南省肿瘤医院腔镜中心
出 处:《中国实用医刊》2013年第23期103-105,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
基 金:郑州市科技攻关基金资助项目(121PPTG498-4)
摘 要:目的探讨内镜黏膜切除术(edoscopic mucosal resection,EMR)及氲离子凝固术(argon plasma coagu-1ation,APC)在治疗胃黏膜脱垂症(gastric mucosa prolapse,GMP)中的作用。方法将胃镜确诊113例胃黏膜脱垂症患者随机分为标准EMR组(40例)、氩离子凝固术组(40例)和对照组(33例);治疗组术后及对照组均采用内科药物治疗4周;1个月后行症状随访及胃镜复查,进行疗效评价。结果标准EMR组、氩离子凝固术组和对照组随访症状缓解总有效率分别为94.87%、90.00%和32.26%,治疗组与对照组相比,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);两治疗组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。胃镜复查总有效率分别为97.37%、91.89%和16.7%;治疗纽与对照纽相比,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01),两治疗组相比差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但EMR组(92.10%)的显效比例高于APC组(73.00%)(P〈0.05)。结论标准EMR治疗胃黏膜脱垂是一种安全、有效的微创治疗手段。Objective To investigate the effects of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)and ar-gon plasma coagulation(APC) on gastric mucosa prolapse(GMP). Methods One hundred and thirteen patients with gastric mucosa prolapse diagnosed by gastroscopy were randomly divided into standard EMR group(n =40) ,APC group(n =40) and control group (n = 33 ). All patients had medical therapy for 4 weeks. These patients were followed up for the changes of symptoms and gastroscopy after 1 month, and the effect was evaluated. Results Compared with control group (32.26%), the totalsymptom relieve effective rate of standard EMR group (94.87%) and APC group (90.00%) was higher ( P 〈 0.01 ). But there was no sig-nificant difference in total symptom relieve ef-fective rate between EMR group and APC group (P 〉 0.05 ). Compared with control group ( 16.7% ), the total effective rate by gastroscopy reexamination of standard EMR group (97.37 % ) and APC group (91.89%)was higher (P 〈0.01). But there was no significant difference in total effective rate by gas-troscopy reexamination between EMR group and APC group ( P 〉 0.05 ). The proportion rate of endo-scopic curative effect in EMR group (92. 11% ) was significantly higher than that in APC group (72.97%) (P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusions Standard EMR treatment of gastric mucosa prolapse is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28