检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗琴[1] 宋依群[1] 徐剑[2] 陈飞杰[2] 薛琼[2]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学,上海200240 [2]上海市电力公司市区供电公司,上海200080
出 处:《华东电力》2013年第11期2373-2377,共5页East China Electric Power
摘 要:在竞争性的电力零售市场中,售电公司失去垄断地位,不仅仍需面临现货市场价格和用户负荷的不确定性,还需要面临销售电价过高时用户可能流失的风险。为弥补传统购电决策的不足之出,本文基于AHPLogit方法分析销售电价对市场份额的影响,结合VaR风险度量方法,以售电公司效用最大化为目标,为不同风险偏好的零售公司建立了销售电价及购电组合决策模型。以PJM数据为基础进行算例仿真,进一步阐述了开放的零售市场环境为零售公司带来的影响。In the competitive electricity retail market, the retailers have lost their monopoly, so they not only have to face the uncertainty from spot market price and user demand, but also have to face the risk of losing their customers if the selling price is not competitive enough. To overcome the shortage of traditional decision-making method, this research analyzes the sale price influence on market share based on AHP-Logit method as well as VaR (value-at-risk) methodology, and then establishes a portfolio decision-making model of sale price and electricity procurement for re-tailers with different risk preferences, aiming at maximal corporate utility. The calculation simulation based on PJM data further expounds the effects of open retail market environment on retailing companies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3