检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡海义[1]
出 处:《中国文学研究》2013年第4期51-54,共4页Research of Chinese Literature
基 金:国家社科基金项目"八股文与明清小说相互关系研究"(12CZW034)的阶段性成果
摘 要:与官方禁毁小说戏曲的法令不同,明清士绅阶层的禁毁舆论除了维护理学道统的目的,还与八股举业有着密切的联系。士绅为了让子弟潜心举业、苦练八股而呼吁禁毁小说戏曲,这种功利诉求直接影响官方政策,带动国家机器参与其中,与官方禁毁法令互为补充,在中国小说戏曲禁毁史上值得关注。Differing from the official laws and decrees which banned and damaged novels and traditional operas, the gentry in Qing dynasty supported public opinion of forbidding and damaging them. Besides aiming to maintain the Neo-Confucian orthodoxy, the above public opinion also had close relations with eight-part essay examinations. In order to make sons and younger brothers devote themselves to the examinations and practise hard their eight-part essay writing, the gentry appealed for forbidding and damaging novels and traditional operas. This utilitarian requirement directly affected the official policy, spurred the government to participate in it, which was the complements of the official laws and decrees, so it deserves concern and attention in the Chinese history of forbidding and damaging novels and traditional operas.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.48.106