检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张健[1]
出 处:《安徽医学》2013年第11期1640-1642,共3页Anhui Medical Journal
摘 要:目的对比分析腹腔镜、胆总管探查术与常规开腹手术治疗胆石症的疗效差异。方法对我院2009年3月至2012年6月30例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术+腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)+T管引流术的胆石症患者(观察组),以及同期行传统开腹手术的28例患者的病例资料进行回顾性分析,比较二者的术前一般情况以及手术后疗效。结果观察组术中出血量、住院时间及并发症例数与对照组比,差异有统计学意义;两组的结石清除率及住院费用相比,差异无统计学意义。结论 "双镜"联用(腹腔镜、胆道镜)治疗胆石症安全、有效、恢复快。Objective To study and compare with the clinical efficacy of the laparoscopic combined with choledochoscopic lithotomy and traditional laparotomy for the treatment of cholelithiasis. Methods A retrospective analysis of 30 patients with cholelithiasis in our hospi- tal from March 2009 to July 2012 with LC + LCBDE + T - tube drainage and 28 patients treated by traditional operation was performed, and the differences of general conditions before the operation and the curative effect between the two groups were revealed. Results Statistically significant differences were found in peroperative bleeding, duration of hospital stay, and number of complication cases between study group and control group. However, there was no statistical significance in the clearance of calculus and cost of hospitalization between the two groups. Conclusion Laparoscopic combined with choledoehoscopie lithotomy is safe, effective, and helpful to recover quickly, which is a minimally invasive surgery with an even brighter future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28