检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]厦门大学附属成功医院(解放军第174医院)皮肤科,福建厦门361003
出 处:《临床军医杂志》2013年第11期1145-1147,共3页Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
摘 要:目的探讨负压吸疱法及薄层削片法自体表皮移植治疗白癜风的疗效观察。方法将86例患者按取皮方法不同分为薄层削片组42例及负压吸疱组44例,观察自体表皮移植后的疗效。结果术后8周,薄层削片法自体表皮移植的总有效率明显高于负压吸疱法(P<0.01)。结论薄层削片法自体表皮移植治疗白癜风较负压吸疱法简便有效。Objective To explore the effect of autologous epidermal graft by suction blister and lamellar chip method on vitiligo. Methods Totally 86 patients were randomly divided into suction blister group ( n = 44) and lamellar chip group ( n = 42), which were treated with suction blister and lamellar chip. Then, an evaluation was made to compare the curative effects between the two groups. Results After 8 weeks' treatment, the therapeutically effective rate of the lamellar chip group was significantly higher than that of the suction blister group( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion The therapy of lamellar chip method is more effective than suction blister.
分 类 号:R758.41[医药卫生—皮肤病学与性病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.136.129