门诊可疑高血压患者诊室血压和ABP监测的比较  

Comparison between Clinic Blood Pressure and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Clinically Suspected Hypertension

作　　者：芦娜[1] 张仁汉[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京市第六医院高血压科,北京100007

出　　处：《中国医药导刊》2013年第11期1753-1754,共2页Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide

摘　　要：目的:通过对门诊可疑高血压患者进行动态血压(ABP)监测以及门诊诊室血压(CBP)的比较,了解高血压病可靠的监测方法。方法:门诊就诊者CBP(SBP≥120mmHg或DBP≥80mmHg)224例分为高血压组(154例)和血压正常高值组(70例),对2组的CBP水平及ABP监测结果进行分析。结果:高血压组和血压正常高值组ABP监测SBP、DBP具有显著性差异(P<0.01)。CBP和ABP监测全天血压平均值具有密切相关(P<0.01)。结论:24小时ABP监测对于高血压早期阶段具有较高的敏感度,CBP和ABP监测全天血压平均值具有密切相关性。Objective：To compare the ambulatory blood pressure （ABP） and clinic blood pressure （CBP） in clinically suspected hypertension subject, and to explore the reliable monitoring method of hypertension. Methods：Outpatients CBP （SBP≥120mmHg or DBP≥80mmHg） 224 were divided into hypertension group （154 cases） and high-normal blood pressure group （70 cases）, the two groups of CBP and ABP monitoring results were analyzed. Results：Hypertension and high-normal blood pressure group ABP monitoring SBP, DBP has significant difference（P〈0.01）. CBP and ABP monitoring throughout the day mean blood pressure is closely related（P〈0.01）. Conclusions：ABP monitoring have higher sensitivity for early stage hypertension. The average blood pressure of ABP was significant associated with CBP.

关 键 词：诊室血压 动态血压监测 高血压 

分 类 号：R544.1[医药卫生—心血管疾病]