检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴德昌[1]
出 处:《河南财经政法大学学报》2013年第6期111-117,共7页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基 金:江西省高校人文社科项目"现代商人法视野下<国际商事合同通则2010>的新发展与适用问题"的阶段性成果(项目编号:FX1303)
摘 要:《国际商事合同通则2010》是国际贸易全球化的应然产物,其在国际商事争端解决中的司法功能愈加凸显。《通则》于司法实践中不仅可以经当事人的选择成为国际商事合同的准据法,而且可以经由法庭的裁量充当国际商事合同的准据法。中国也已有一些与此相关的司法案例,学界以往一直对《通则》能否作为合同准据法适用存有质疑。2013年施行的《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国涉外民事关系法律适用法〉若干问题解释(一)》加剧了这种质疑。The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2010 (UPICC) is a natural out-come from globalization of international trade which has played an outstanding role in dealing with disputes of international commercial contract. In judicial process UPICC has been chosen to become applicable law of international commercial contract not only by contract parties, but also by tribunal court for its duty. China has some cases involving usage of UPICC as international contract applicable law, but jurisprudential circle always has different views. The argument is intensified with the implementation of Interpretation of the Supreme People' s Court about Several Issues(I) in 2013 on the Law of Law Application for Foreign Related Civil Relations in the People' s Republic of China.
关 键 词:《国际商事合同通则2010》 适用实践 法理分析 发展趋势
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200