韩拙《山水纯全集》对前人画论的引用与发展  

Reference to and Development of Predecessors' Art Theories in Hanzhuo's Pure Landscape Corpora

作　　者：李艳婷[1] 

机构地区：[1]晋中学院美术学院,山西晋中030600

出　　处：《中北大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第5期93-96,共4页Journal of North University of China：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：宋代开始,一些绘画评鉴大师为了集画论之大成,多把前人画论抄掇一遍,然后再加入一些自己的观点,最具代表的是韩拙的《山水纯全集》。长期以来,学术界认为此书"抄袭"之处较多,并随意修改原著,态度很不端正,学术价值较低。然而,韩拙虽然"抄袭"很多,但有些思想却是对前人画论的再发展,意义重大。韩拙在郭若虚"三病"基础上"石霍"病的提出,在王维"意在笔先"思想下的"预想目前"、"笔法推之"观点,以及对荆浩"四势"、"六要"的新解和新"三远"的阐发,都是他有意对前人理论的思考和创新,具有一定的生命力和学术价值。For a Long time, Hanzhuo＇s Pure Landscape Corpora in Song Dynasty was considered as a work which has little academic value because of its plagiarism, random modification of original work and attitude problems. However, as for the author, in despite of its plagiarism, many of his thoughts redeveloped the painting views of predecessors of great importance. Hanzhuo put forward ＂Que＂ based on Guo Ruoxu＇s ＂three mistakes＂, proposed ＂preconception of the present situation＂ and ＂emphasizing the techniques of painting＂ based on Wang Wei＇s thought of ＂work out the plot before putting pen to paper＂, and elaborated Jing Hao＇s new explanation of ＂four powers＂, ＂six demands＂ and ＂three new prospects＂. All of these theoories are his original thinking and innovation to the theories of the predecessors. Therefore it is a work with new vitality and academic values.

关 键 词：《山水纯全集》 王维 荆浩 新“三远” 

分 类 号：J205[艺术—美术]