检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢俊秀[1]
出 处:《西北师大学报(社会科学版)》2013年第6期26-32,共7页Journal of Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"农村新型社区化与社会管理创新研究"(13BSH022)
摘 要:长期以来,城中村社区的治理秉承"乡政村治"的规则,不过这种"村治"呈现出与社区集体经济高度粘合的特征,但是在"撤制"后,城中村被纳入城市范围,城中村治理呈现"双轨政治"的特征。作为基层政府代表的社区自治组织居委会和作为村集体经济代表的社区经济组织实现了社区治理的权力协作和让渡,其实质是以国家为代表的全民所有制与以村集体为代表的集体所有制分享城中村社区公共权力的治理过程,这种治理过程凸现了城中村被纳入城市后社区治理的微观逻辑。For a long time, the village communities have been managed by rule of "village autonomy. But after the urban villages are included in the city, there appears the "dual track politics". These villages are highly characterized both as the community autonomous organization with the grassroots representatives and as representatives of the village collective economy organization with power cooperation and transferring, whose essence is the management process of ownership by the whole people as the representative of the state and collective ownership as the representative of the village collective share.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145