无痛人流术与普通人流术的临床对比分析  

Clinical analysis of painless induced abortion and artificial abortion

作　　者：张文博[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北省邯郸市中心医院,河北邯郸056002

出　　处：《世界最新医学信息文摘》2013年第17期21-22,共2页World Latest Medicine Information Electronic Version

摘　　要：目的：对无痛人流术及普通人流术的临床效果及安全性进行对比、分析。方法随机抽取我院自2012年1月至2013年4月收治的孕周为6～10个周，要求行人工流产术的孕妇共360例，分为普通组、无痛组各180例，手术前1～4小时两组孕妇均给予米索前列醇。无痛组在此基础上手术时由麻醉师实施全身麻醉。结果两组孕妇在子宫收缩情况、人工流产综合症发生率、出血量、手术时配合程度等指标方面差异明显。结论对孕妇实行麻醉并进行无痛流产，能够有效的减轻孕妇流产时的痛楚，对人工流产后并发症的发生有积极的预防作用。Objective painless abortion and abortion ordinary clinical efficacy and safety were compared and analyzed. Methods randomly selected hospital since January 2012~ 2013 in April admitted to 6 ~ 10 weeks gestation, requiring artiifcial abortion of 360 pregnant women were divided into normal group, each group 180 cases painless surgery 1~4 hours before the two groups of pregnant women were given misoprostol. Painless surgery group on the basis of general anesthesia by the anesthesiologist.Results The two groups of pregnant women in the uterine contraction, the incidence of abortion syndrome, bleeding, surgery and other indicators with the degree of signiifcant differences. Conclusion The implementation of anesthesia for pregnant women and painless abortion, can effectively relieve the pain of miscarriage when, for post^abortion complications have a positive role in prevention.

关 键 词：无痛人流术 普通人流术 静脉推注 米索前列醇 

分 类 号：R714[医药卫生—妇产科学]