检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《农业经济与管理》2013年第6期52-59,共8页Agricultural Economics and Management
基 金:南京农业大学"SRT"项目(1216A23);江苏省哲学社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(2012JDXM007)
摘 要:通过对江苏南京、徐州235户农户的问卷调查得知,农户借贷途径选择行为因农户金融需求差异而不同。其中借贷成本(利息成本、人情成本)、个人信用及偿还能力等是农户选择借贷途径时的主要考虑因素。经Logistic模型实证分析表明,借款额度越大,农户越倾向于正规金融借贷渠道;借款期限越长,农户越偏好非正规借贷渠道;有经营生产需求的农户通常选择正规融资渠道借贷,而需补足生活消费资金缺口时农户偏好非正规融资;年龄越小的户主越倾向从正规融资渠道借贷。政府的金融改革政策需考虑农户多样化、多层次的融资需求特征,正规金融应推出小额性、低息性、短期性的金融产品、简化贷款手续、提高贷款灵活性并加强贷款宣传力度和扩大宣传范围。Based on a survey of 235 farm households in Nanjing and Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, the authors concluded that farmers' borrowing choices varied for different financial needs. Borrowing costs(interest costs and social costs), credit standing and repaying capability and so on were farm households' main considerations when choosing a borrowing way. By empirical analyzing in Logistic model, the authors found that: Farmers who need relatively larger amount of money tend to borrow from formal lenders; farmers who needed longer-term loans tended to borrow via informal ways; households with production loans demand usually choose formal lenders, while chose informal lenders when lacking money to cover daily expense; younger farmers tended to borrow from formal lenders. Government's financial reform policies should apply to farmers' diversified and multi-level financial demand.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.72