检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国药房》2013年第48期4574-4576,共3页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:比较艾迪注射液与康莱特注射液联合化疗治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的经济学效果。方法:将51例NSCLC患者随机分为A组(艾迪注射液联合化疗治疗组,27例)和B组(康莱特注射液联合化疗治疗组,24例),观察两组的疗效,并运用药物经济学评价方法比较其成本-效果。结果:A组总有效率为44.4%,治疗成本为23 772.5元;B组总有效率为37.5%,治疗成本为23 254.0元,两组成本-效果比(C/E)分别为535.4和620.0。以B组为参照的增量成本-效果比(ΔC/ΔE)为75.1。结论:两组治疗方案比较,艾迪注射液联合化疗治疗NSCLC是更为经济、有效的治疗方案。OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacoeconomical effectiveness of Aidi injection or Kailaite injection combined with chemotherapy for nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: 51 NSCLC patients were randomly divided into group A (Aidi injection combined with chemotherapy group, 27 cases) and group B (Kailaite injection combined with chemotherapy, 24 cases). Therapeutic efficacies of 2 groups were observed, and cost-effectiveness of them was compared with pharmacoeconomics. RESULTS: Effective rate and cost of group A were 44.4% and 23 772.5 yuan; those of group B were 37.5% and 23 254.0 yuan. Cost-effectiveness (C/E) ratio of 2 groups were 535.4 and 620.0. The incremental △C/△E of group A was 75.1 to group B. CONCLUSIONS: Aidi injection combined with chemotherapy is more economical and effective than Kailaite injection combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80