学术论文合著规模与引文影响力的相关性分析——以图书情报学为例  

The Correlation Analysis between Co-authoring Size of Academic Papers and Its Citation Impact: A Case Study of Library and Information Science

作　　者：钟镇[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南工业大学管理学院,郑州450001

出　　处：《情报杂志》2013年第12期127-131,164,共6页Journal of Intelligence

基　　金：河南省教育厅人文社科项目"河南省国际科学合作的研究绩效评价与对策研究"(编号:2013-QN-062);河南工业大学高层次人才基金"中国食品科学与技术研究评价"(编号:2013BS008)的资助

摘　　要：利用Web of Science数据库提供的数据以及基于固定引文窗口下的篇均被引频次、论文作者数两项计量指标分析了图书情报学科论文作者数与论文影响力之间的关系。研究结果发现,从引文影响力角度看,图情论文的最佳合著规模为4人。在一些与科学计量学有关的情报学期刊上,独著论文的影响力不仅要高于某些形式的合著论文,而且当合著人数超过两人时,还出现了篇均被引频次随合著人数增加而下降的现象。对此现象,从论文选题的角度进行了部分讨论。Based on the data from Web of Science and the two indicators of the number of authors and the average number of citations per paper in fixed citation window, this paper studied the relationship between the number of authors per paper, productivity and citation im- pact in library and information science. The results showed that, the optimal co-authoring size of library and information science papers was 4 from the citation impact perspective. The citation impact of single-author papers was higher than that of co-authored papers in some scientometrics journals. It even might happen that in some journals, when the number of co-author was more than 2, the more the authors the papers had, the less the citations they received. We also conducted a discussion on this phenomenon from the point of research topics.

关 键 词：论文合著 合著规模 引文影响力 科学合作 合著人数 最佳合著规模 引文分析 固定引文窗口 

分 类 号：G301[文化科学]