静息心率对非高血压人群新发糖尿病的影响  被引量:7

Impact of resting heart rate on new-onset diabetes in population without hypertension

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:吴寿岭[1] 刘小雪[2] 朱晨蕊[1] 魏晓明[1] 李慧英[1] 杜鑫[1] 林黎明[1] 李俊娟[2] 刘妍[2] 

机构地区:[1]河北联合大学附属开滦医院心内科,唐山063000 [2]河北联合大学研究生院

出  处:《中华心血管病杂志》2013年第11期968-973,共6页Chinese Journal of Cardiology

摘  要:目的 探讨静息心率对非高血压人群新发糖尿病(NOD)的影响.方法 采用前瞻性队列研究方法,以参加2006至2007年度开滦集团职工健康体检的101 510例职工中空腹血糖≤7.0mmol/L、无糖尿病史、未使用降糖药物、空腹血糖资料及静息心率测量资料完整、收缩压<140 mm Hg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)和舒张压<90 mm Hg、无高血压病史、未使用降压药物、未服用调脂药和β受体阻滞剂的48 926例职工作为观察队列.排除未参加2008至2009年度、2010至2011年度体检以及空腹血糖资料缺失者,最终纳入统计分析的职工共29 910例.依据2006至2007年度静息心率测量值,将观察对象分为第一分位组(静息心率< 63次/min)、第二分位组(63次/min≤静息心率<70次/min)、第三分位组(70次/min≤静息心率<75次/min)、第四分位组(静息心率≥75次/min).采用Kaplan-Meier法计算糖尿病发病率;采用多因素Cox回归分析心率与NOD的关系.结果 (1)第一分位组、第二分位组、第三分位组、第四分位组糖尿病的发病率分别为11.22/1000人年、13.58/1000人年、13.96/1000人年、17.55/1000人年;其中,男性分别为12.17/1000人年、15.20/1000人年、16.08/1000人年、20.44/1000人年,女性分别为8.29/1000人年、9.38/1000人年、8.86/1000人年、9.60/1000人年.(2)校正了年龄、性别、收缩压、舒张压、体质指数、甘油三酯、总胆固醇、高敏C反应蛋白、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、吸烟、饮酒、糖尿病家族史后,多因素Cox回归分析显示:与第一分位组比较,第二分位组(HR=1.20,95% CI:1.04 ~ 1.40,P<0.05)、第三分位组(HR=1.25,95% CI:1.07~1.45,P<0.01)、第四分位组(HR=1.58,95% CI:1.36 ~ 1.82,P<0.01)NOD的发病风险增加;进一步校正空腹血糖后,与第一分位组相比,第二分位组(HR=1.21,95% CI:1.04 ~ 1.40,P<0.01)、第四分位组(HR=1.22,95% CI:1.06~ 1.41,P<0.01)�Objective To investigate the impact of resting heart rate (RHR) on new-onset diabetes (NOD) in population without hypertension. Methods This prospective cohort study was performed in 2006 and 2007 and screened 101 510 participants. All subjects were employees of the Kailuan Group, a state-run coal mining company. The observation cohort included 48 926 subjects with normal fasting blood glucose (FBG) 〈 7.0 retooL/L, no history of diabetes, complete FBG and RHR examination data, systolic blood pressure 〈 140 mm Hg( 1 mm Hg = 0. 133 kPa),diastolic blood pressure 〈 90 mm Hg, no history of hypertension, and no use of hypoglycemie agents or antihypertensive drugs. We excluded participants without a health examination in 2008--2009 or 2010--2011 and those with incomplete examination data. A total of 29 910 participants were included in the final analysis. The observation population was divided into four groups according to RHR data collected during 2006--2007 health examinations: quartile 1 ( RHR 〈 63 beats/rain) ; quartile 2 ( 63 beats/rain 〈~ RHR 〈 70 beats/rain ) ; quartile 3 ( 70 beats/rain ~〈 RHR 〈 75 beats/min) ; quartile 4 ( RHR ~〉 75 beats/min). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate the incidence of NOD. The relationship between RHR and NOD was estimated using Cox proportional hazard analysis. Results The incidences of NOD/1000 person-years for the above quartiles of RHR were 11.22, 13.58,13.96, and 17.55, respectively in the total observational population; the corresponding incidences were 12. 17, 15.20, 16. 08, 20.44, and 8. 29, 9.38, 8.86, and 9. 60 in men and women, respectively. Compared with quartile 1, Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that the other three RHR groups had an increased risk of NOD after adjusting for age, gender, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and other risk factors. The hazard ratio values for these groups were 1.20 (95 % CI: 1.04 - 1.40,P〈0.05),1.25 (95%CI:1.07-1.45,P〈0.01) and 1

关 键 词:心率 糖尿病 危险性评估 

分 类 号:R587.1[医药卫生—内分泌]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象