检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄杰灵[1] 胡广[2] 袁金凤[2] 罗媛媛[1]
机构地区:[1]中国计量学院生命科学学院,杭州310018 [2]浙江大学生命科学学院,杭州310058
出 处:《应用昆虫学报》2013年第6期1679-1691,共13页Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology
基 金:浙江省自然科学基金(Y5080117和Y504253)
摘 要:陷阱法和Winkler法是调查土壤动物的两种常规方法,然而这两种方法的调查效率各有优劣。本研究于2010年秋季,在千岛湖中心湖区选取了15个面积不同的岛屿,同时采用Winkler法和陷阱法采集岛屿上的土壤节肢动物,在岛屿这一封闭生境中比较两种方法收集土壤节肢动物的效率。结果表明,两种方法捕获土壤动物类群丰富度差异不显著,但多样性指数差异极显著。Winkler法对常规土壤节肢动物类群的采集效率优于陷阱法,尤其对运动较缓慢、活动范围较小的土壤节肢动物类群的采集具有优势;陷阱法则更优于采集运动能力较强、活动范围较大的类群。基于样方的稀疏曲线结果说明,Winkler法能用少量样方快速获取研究区域的土壤节肢动物群落基本组成,推荐在面积较小的岛屿上使用;而在面积较大的岛屿上使用陷阱法能够获取更多的类群。ChaoJaccard相似性系数比较则显示两种方法所取的土壤节肢动物相似性在大型岛屿上差异较大,说明大样本数据的采集需要两种方法同时使用能够提高数据的完整性和可靠性。本研究的结果为土壤节肢动物研究的方法选择提供了数据支持,具有一定的实际应用性。The Winkler method and pitfall trapping are two conventional methods used for soil fauna surveys, with each having advantages at different aspects and scales. In autumn 2010, we select 15 different areas of the island, we compared the efficiencies of these methods for collecting soil arthropods on land-bridge islands in the Thousand Island Lake (TIL) , Zhejiang, China. The results show that, Taxon richness was not significantly different between the two methods but the diversity indices were significantly different. The Winkler method is superior to pitfall trapping in collecting soil arthropods, especially for those taxa with slower movement and smaller territories, whereas pitfall trapping is more inclined to collect more mobile species. The sample-based rarefaction curves showed that the Winkler method can quickly achieve the basic list of local soil arthropods with fewer samples, and is thus recommended for smaller islands, whereas pitfall traps can capture more taxa on the larger islands. Analysis of Chao-Jaccard similarity coefficients showed significant differences between the community compositions estimated by the two methods on large islands. This suggests that large scale sampling requires the use of both methods to improve the integrity and reliability of data.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46