检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴敏[1] 黄毓婵[1] 马育璇[1] 周芳[1] 廖丹[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第一医院手术室,广东广州510080
出 处:《现代临床护理》2013年第10期32-33,共2页Modern Clinical Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨两种不同手术体位在小儿短段型巨结肠根治术中的应用效果。方法将60例行经腹会阴行巨结肠根治术的先天性巨结肠患儿,根据手术次序分为对照组和观察组,每组各30例,对照组采用传统截石位,观察组采用悬吊式截石位。结果观察组手术野暴露优于对照组;皮肤不良反应的发生率低于对照组,两组比较,差异具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论采用悬吊式截石位可充分暴露经腹会阴行巨结肠根治术的术野,降低皮肤不良反应的发生。Objective To compare the effects of two positions in the infant megacolon radical operation. Methods Sixty infants undergoing abdominal perineal megacolon radical operation were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group in equal number. The former took the traditional lithotomy position and the latter modified suspended lithotomy position. Results The operative exposures in the observation group were much more sufficient than that of the control group (P 〈 0.05). While adverse skin reactions in the observation group were more uncommon than those of the control group (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The suspended lithotomy position may provide a better exposure and result in fewer adverse skin reactions during the abdominal perineal megacolon radical operation.
关 键 词:小儿巨结肠 经腹会阴行巨结肠根治术 手术野 皮肤不良反应
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222