论意思表示瑕疵的共同法律行为——以社团决议撤销为研究视角  

On the Common Legal Act with the Defect of Declaration

作　　者：许中缘[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院

出　　处：《中国法学》2013年第6期56-66,共11页China Legal Science

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"民商合一视角下民事权利体系的立法设计研究"(项目批准号:10CFX045);中南大学升华学者特聘教授资助项目的阶段性成果

摘　　要：与传统法律行为的成立方式不同,共同法律行为是在遵循既定章程(协议)的基础上,依据一定的程序、遵循多数决原则达成意思表示的一致。违反章程的共同法律行为(决议)属于团体的意思表示瑕疵,有别于成员的表决权瑕疵。传统的意思表示规则适用于表决权瑕疵,但不适用于决议瑕疵。表决权的撤销,以因果考量来确定是否撤销整个共同行为。决议瑕疵的撤销应依据团体法的规则。依照法律行为成立与生效逻辑,决议瑕疵包括决议不成立、可撤销与无效。传统法律行为以交易观念所确立的规则,与共同法律行为存在的团体观念具有本质差异,不能当然适用于共同法律行为(决议)。为规范共同法律行为,我国未来民法典应在总则中规定团体决议的相关规则。Different with the rules of traditional legal act,, the establishment of common legal act is based on the established constitution （agreement） according to certain procedures and the majority rule. Therefore, the common legal act which goes against with the rules and procedures belongs to the defect of group declaration, which is different with the defect of member＇s declaration. The traditional rules apply to the defects of voting right rather than applying to the defect of resolution. The revocation of voting right should consider whether it is necessary to revoke the whole common act on the basis of the causation. The revocation of defect resolution should accord to rules of group law. According to the logic of establishment and validity of legal act, defect resolution includes falseness, revocability and invalidity. The rules established by traditional legal act on the basis of transaction concept are essentially different with the group concept of common legal act （resolution） . Therefore, in order to regulate relevant rules should be specified in the the common legal acts, the organization resolution and its general principles of civil code in China.

关 键 词：共同法律行为 决议 意思表示瑕疵 撤销权 

分 类 号：D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学] D923[政治法律—法学]