检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《华南国防医学杂志》2013年第11期808-809,823,共3页Military Medical Journal of South China
摘 要:目的比较临床结肠癌治疗中完整结肠系膜切除(complete mesocolon excision,CEM)术与传统根治术的应用效果。方法回顾性分析作者医院普通外科2009-03/2013-01收治的50例结肠癌患者的临床资料。结果 CME组患者的淋巴结清扫数量明显比传统手术组多,并发症发生率和复发率均明显比传统手术组低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);输血量明显比传统手术组少,中位排气时间明显比传统手术组短,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论临床结肠癌治疗中CME切除术较传统根治术具有较好的应用效果,值得推广。Objective To compare the clinical application effect of Complete Mesocolon Excision (CEM) technique resection and traditional radical mastectomy in the treatment of colon cancer. Methods The clinical data of 50 colon canc- er patients treated in our hospital from March 2009 to January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Results The number of lymph node dissection in the observation group was significantly larger, the incidence of complications and recurrence rate were significantly lower than those in the control group (P^0. 05). The intraoperative blood transfusion was significantly less and the median discharge time was significantly shorter than those of patients in the control group (P%0. 0l). Conclu- sion The clinical application effect of CME resection is better than that of the traditional radical mastectomy in the treat- ment of colon cancer and is worth promoting.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44