检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何花[1] 郭玉林[1] 朱凯[1] 来彦博[1] 刘珊[1] 张社宁[1]
机构地区:[1]宁夏医科大学总医院放射科,宁夏银川750004
出 处:《中国医学影像技术》2013年第12期2007-2010,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
摘 要:目的对比分析CT Robson分期与TNM分期诊断肾细胞癌的价值。方法回顾性分析经手术病理证实的129例肾细胞癌(RCC)的CT图像,依据Robson分期法和TNM分期法进行术前CT分期;将两种分期结果与病理分期结果进行比较,计算两种CT分期法诊断的正确率。结果 CT Robson分期、TNM分期中的T分期和M分期与病理分期的一致性好(Kappa值=0.75、0.74、0.54)。Robson分期的准确率为81.40%(105/129),TNM总体分期的准确率为69.77%(90/129),二者差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.73,P=0.03)。结论 CT是肾细胞癌术前分期的有效方法。Robson分期的准确性高于TNM分期。Objective To compare diagnosis value of CT Robson staging and TNM staging of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods Totally 129 patients with RCC confirmed by surgical pathology were collected, and CT images were analyzed and evaluated according to Robson staging and TNM staging, and then compared with pathology staging to calculate the accuracy. Results The consistency of Robson staging, T staging and M staging of TNM to pathological staging were good(Kappa=0.75, 0.74, 0.54). The accuracy of CT Robson was 81.40% (105/129), while of TNM was 69.77% (90/129, χ2=4.73, P=0.03). Conclusion CT is an effective method for preoperative staging of RCC. The accuracy of Robson staging is higher than that of TNM staging.
关 键 词:肾细胞癌 体层摄影术 X线计算机 Robson分期 TNM分期
分 类 号:R814.42[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R737.11[医药卫生—放射医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166