检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东中医药大学人文社科学院,山东济南250355 [2]山东大学卫生管理与政策研究中心卫生部卫生经济与政策研究重点实验室
出 处:《中国卫生事业管理》2013年第12期929-931,959,共4页Chinese Health Service Management
基 金:山东省人文社会科学项目“山东省中医药服务综合评价研究”(编号:12-ZZ-SH-06)
摘 要:目的:对山东省乡镇卫生院中医医疗服务效率进行评价,为乡镇卫生院发展中医医疗服务提供参考。方法:使用DEA数据包络方法分析乡镇卫生院的中医医疗服务效率。结果:从总体上看,纯技术效率平均值为0.936,纯技术效率为1的999家。综合效率有效的为773所,占总数的59.7%,规模报酬中,规模效率不变的有775家,占总数的59.07%,而规模递增的有74家,仅占总数的5.64%;从投入和产出上看,投入指标除了卫生人力之外均有不同程度的浪费,而产出指标均未达到目标值。从对县域的效率分析看,效率高的主要集中在GDP较低的地区。讨论及政策建议:加大对中医药服务的财政支持和政策导向,提高乡镇卫生院中医医疗服务能力,提高医疗设备尤其是中医特色医疗设备的利用率。Objective To evaluate the efficiency of Traditional Chinese Medicine services in township health centers of Shan-dong Province,and provide references for the development of Traditional Chinese Medicine in township health centers. Methods The efficiency of Traditional Chinese Medicine services in township health centers was analyzed with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Results The average of overall Pure Technical Efficiency Score (VRS) was 0.936, in which 999 eases had the efficiency score as 1. And 59.7% of them (773 cases) had valid comprehensive efficiency. For the scale reward ,775 cases (59.07%) had constant efficiency, and only 74(5.64% ) had increasing efficiency. On the Projection analysis, surplus and waste existed in the input indexes, except health resources index. And output indexes didn't achieve the target. The township health centers with higher efficiency mainly concentrated in the lower GDP region. Conclusion The government should strengthen financial support and policy guidance on Traditional Chinese Medicine, improve the ability to Traditional Chinese Medicine services in township health centers, and increase the utilization efficiency of medical equipment.
分 类 号:R197.62[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80