检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾玉琳[1] 肖喜刚[1] 谢德轩[1] 朱凯[1] 唐亮[1] 杜英[1]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院CT室,150001
出 处:《临床放射学杂志》2013年第12期1775-1779,共5页Journal of Clinical Radiology
摘 要:目的评价iDose4迭代重建在回顾性心电门控主动脉CT血管成像(CTA)低辐射剂量扫描中的价值。方法搜集37例回顾性心电门控主动脉CTA检查的患者,其中18例采用常规剂量扫描(A组),19例采用低剂量扫描(B组)。A组采用滤波反投影重建技术,B组除采用滤波反投影外,还采用iDose4迭代重建技术。分析所有图像质量并计算其辐射剂量。结果与A组比较,B组的iDose46水平重建噪声低、对比信噪比高;在B组中,iDose46水平重建较滤波反投影及iDose4其他水平重建噪声低、对比信噪比高、主观评分高;B组的有效辐射剂量较A组降低了约38.5%。结论 iDose46水平重建技术可以在回顾性心电门控主动脉CTA中降低辐射剂量的同时提高图像质量。Objective To detect the value of iDose4 iterative reconstruction (IR) technique in retrospective ECG ga ted thoracoabdominal aortic CT angiography (CTA) with low radiation dose. Methods 37 patients underwent clinically indicated thoraeoabdminal aortic CTA were collected. 18 patients were scanned with a routine dose (group A) and 19 with a low dose (group B). The group A was reconstructed by filtered backprojection (FBP) reconstruction technique. The group B was reconstructed by FBP reconstruction and iDose4 IR technique. All images were evaluated and the effective radi ation dose was calculated. Results Compared with the group A, level 6 of iDose4 IR technique for group B resulted in low image noise and high CNR. In group B, level 6 of iDose4 IR technique resulted in low image noise, high CNR and high score of subjective evaluation on image quality. The average effective dose of the group B was about 38.5% lower than that of group A. Conclusion Level 6 of iDose4 IR technique can improve image quality and reduce radiation dose simultane ously in retrospective ECG gated thoraeoabdominal aortic CTA.
关 键 词:体层摄影术 X线计算机主动脉血管造影术迭代重建技术辐射剂量
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30