高血压脑出血锥颅血肿抽吸引流术与开颅血肿清除术的对比研究  

skull hypertensive cerbral hemorrhage and hematoma aspiration drainage of hematoma evcacuation compartive study

作　　者：于洋[1] 

机构地区：[1]威海市立医院,山东威海264200

出　　处：《中国卫生产业》2013年第32期72-72,74,共2页China Health Industry

摘　　要：目的探讨锥颅血肿抽吸引流术和开颅血肿清除术两种不同的手术方法治疗高血压脑出血的临床疗效。方法选取在本院接受治疗的高血压脑出血患者98例作为研究对象,其中锥颅组50例行锥颅血肿抽吸引流术,开颅组48例行开颅血肿清除术。比较两组患者的临床效果。结果锥颅组的平均手术时间少于开颅组(P<0.05);脑功能恢复情况锥颅组优于开颅组(P<0.05);死亡率锥颅组低于开颅组(P<0.05)。结论早期锥颅血肿抽吸引流术具有手术时间短、微创、操作相对简单、安全有效等优点,是治疗高血压脑出血的有效手术方式。Objective To study the clinical effect of two different surgical treatment in treating hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. Methods Choose 98 cerebral hemor rhage patients treated in our hospital as the research object, which the 50 receive Stereotaxic aspiration operation,48 receive craniotomy hematoma removal operation.Compare the clinical effect of two groups Results The average surgery time of the former is less than latter(P<0.05);Brain function recovery of the former is better than the latter(P<0.05);The mortality of the former is lower than the latter(P<0.05).Conclusion Early cranial hematoma smoke draw flow cone with a shorter operation time, minimally invasive, relatively simple operation, safe and effective, etc, is effective in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage operation.

关 键 词：高血压脑出血 开颅血肿清除术 锥颅血肿抽吸引流术 

分 类 号：R651.1[医药卫生—外科学]