困境与探索:专利无效之司法判定制度研究  

Dilemma and Explore: A Study of the system of judicial determination of patent invalid

作　　者：易玲[1] 周勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南工业大学,湖南株洲421000

出　　处：《中南林业科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第5期149-153,共5页Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology（Social Sciences）

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金项目:"专利无效判定的行政与司法博弈研究"(编号:13CFX090);湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目:"专利诉讼中技术法官制度之构建与挑战研究"(编号:12YBA100);湖南省教育厅高等学校科学研究项目:"提高专利审查质量之对策研究"(编号:12W016);湖南省自然科学基金项目:"专利审查机制及其创新性研究"(编号:13JJ4092);第54批博士后基金项目(编号:2013M540187)

摘　　要："循环诉讼"和审理结果矛盾等问题自从专利制度建立以来已愈趋严重,尤其是在专利侵权纠纷中。强化司法判定之权威是现行趋势,在对知识产权审理模式进行改革的问题上,我国完全可以在现有"三审合一"的探索上逐步作出改变,以区域性知识产权上诉法院为现阶段的改革目标,最终将知识产权案件从普通人民法院中独立出来,建立单独的知识产权法院隶属于最高人民法院的体系,为专利无效之司法判定创造外部条件。这不仅能够解决我国现有专利无效诉讼存在的问题,也能树立一个良好的国际形象。＂Cycle action＂ and the trial result problem has been more and more serious since the establishment of the invalid system, especially in the patent infringement dispute. Strengthening the authority of judicial decision is the current trend. In the intellectual property trial mode reform, we can gradually change based on the study of ＂Three in One Trial＂, and the regional intellectual property court of appeals as the current stage of the reform target. Eventually, intellectual property cases can be independent from the general people＇s court, creating a separate intellectual property courts of the Supreme People＇s Court System in order to provide external conditions for the judicial determination of patent invalid. It can not only solve our current patent invalid litigation exists various defects, but also set a good international image.

关 键 词：专利无效宣告 循环诉讼 区域性知识产权上诉法院 司法判定 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]