检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]复旦大学附属眼耳鼻喉科医院麻醉科,上海200031
出 处:《护理学杂志》2013年第22期10-12,共3页
摘 要:目的了解三级甲等医院麻醉护士的培训现状。方法采用自制问卷对上海6所三级甲等医院的127名在职麻醉护士的培训现状进行调查。结果麻醉护士对培训的平均满意度为6.15分;麻醉医生一对一带教以及麻醉医生对麻醉护士授课为主要培训方式;61.7%的麻醉护士最看重麻醉相关技能培训;不同年资的麻醉护士对于最佳培训方式的选择不同。结论麻醉护士对其所接受的培训方式满意度不高,应针对不同条件的麻醉专科护士实施针对性培训。Objective To investigate training status for nurse anesthetists in tertiary hospitals.Methods A total of 127 on-the-job nurse anesthetists working in 6 tertiary hospitals in Shanghai were investigated by using a self-designed questionnaire.Results Nurse anesthetists scored 6.15 points of 10 on satisfaction with the training.One-to-one instruction and lecture by anesthesiologists were the dominant training methods.Strictly,61.7% of them valued anesthesia-related skills training,and those with different service length chosen different training models.Conclusion Nurse anesthetists'satisfaction with anesthesia-related training is not enough,so that individualized training should be provided.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.118