中文版创伤后成长量表应用于乳腺癌患者的信效度分析  

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of post-traumatic growth inventory scale in breast cancer survivors

作　　者：董璐[1] 胡雁[1] 徐国会[2] 黄嘉玲[3] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学护理学院,200032 [2]复旦大学附属华东医院,200032 [3]复旦大学附属肿瘤医院,上海200032

出　　处：《护理学杂志》2013年第22期21-23,共3页

摘　　要：目的 分析中文版创伤后成长量表（PTGI）的信度和效度.方法 采用翻译并修订的中文版创伤后成长量表对192例乳腺癌患者进行调查,分析其信效度.结果 经因子分析21个条目,提取出新可能性、欣赏生活、人际关系、精神改变、个人力量5个因子,可解释方差的67.85％,问卷总Cronbach＇s a系数为0.926,折半信度为0.900.中文版PTGI总分为14～98（64.23±18.40）分,不同年龄、不同受教育程度及疾病不同阶段患者得分差异无统计学意义（均P＞0.05）.参加癌友互助小组支持的患者PTG得分高于未参加者（P＜0.01）.结论 中文版创伤后成长量表具有较好的信效度,可用于测量乳腺癌患者创伤后成长状况.Objective To analyze reliability and validity of the Chinese version of post-traumatic growth inventory （PTGI）.Methods A total of 192 patients with breast cancer were investigated with the Chinese PTGI to analyze its reliability and validity.Results Five factors were extracted from the 21-item scale by using exploratory factor analysis,and were named as new possibility,life enjoyment,interpersonal relationship,mental changes,and personal power,accounting for 67.85 ％ of the explainable variance.The general Cronbach＇s α coefficient was 0.926,and the Guttman split half coefficient was 0.900.The PTGI score averaged 64.23±18.40 points （range 14-98 points）.The PTGI scores showed no significant differences in patients in different age groups,with different education levels,and at different disease stages （P＞0.05 for all）.Patients participated in a mutual-help program scored significantly higher than those did not （P＜0.01）.Conclusion The Chinese PTGI has satisfactory reliability and validity,which could be used to measure posttraumatic growth in breast cancer patients.

关 键 词：乳腺癌 创伤后成长量表 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R473.6[医药卫生—护理学]