检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宿迟[1]
机构地区:[1]北京市第二中级人民法院
出 处:《北京政法职业学院学报》2013年第4期24-28,共5页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
摘 要:1994年《消费者权益保护法》实施以来,法学研究者、社会民众、执法人员等对惩罚性赔偿制度的讨论持有热情,对该制度的司法适用也一直是难点和疑点。《消费者权益保护法》修正案对惩罚性赔偿的修改具有进步意义,但并没有终结对该问题的讨论。以《消费者权益保护法》修正案通过为背景在适用范围、主观要件和赔偿额等方面的讨论仍有空间。Since the implementation of the Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests in 1994, heated discussions over punitive damages have been continuously going on among legal researchers, the public and law enforcement officers. Judicial application related to punitive damages has been a difficult and questionable issue. The revision of punitive damages in the amendments to the Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests is a significant progress, though the discussions over the issue in question do not come to an end. There are still aspects to discuss, such as the application scope, subjective elements and the amount of damages in the context of the newly-adopted amendments to the Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interest.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.217.66