政府辟谣行为可诉性分析  

Analysis of Litigable Nature of Rumor Refutations Issued by Governments

作　　者：汤磊[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法学院

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2013年第4期29-34,共6页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：随着社会信息化程度的加深,面对社会公众的质疑和猜忌,政府辟谣行为日益普遍。错误的辟谣信息不仅严重损害政府的公信力,同时也会损害公众的合法权益。依据辟谣行为性质将其分为政府信息公开类、行政指导类和不属于职能范围的一般性辟谣三大类,针对不同类型的行为,尝试在目前法律框架下探究司法救济思路和相关制度的改善。With the deepening of the use of information and communication technology in the society, it becomes more and more common for governments to refute rumors when the public has suspicion and questions about some events. Incorrect information used for refutation will not only affect the credibility of governments to a great extent, but also damage the legitimate rights and interests of the public. Based on the nature of rumor refutation, this article puts rumor refutation ways into three categories, namely, government information disclosure, administrative guidance and others that are outside governmental functions and, in accordance with different categories, explores judicial remedies and ways to improve relevant systems under the existing legal framework.

关 键 词：政府辟谣 政府信息公开 行政指导 行政诉讼 

分 类 号：D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]