机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院老年医学科,北京100038
出 处:《中华医院感染学杂志》2013年第23期5653-5655,共3页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基 金:北京市保健科研基金项目(京11-11)
摘 要:目的探讨老年社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者血D-二聚体水平及与肺炎严重度指标的相关性,将D-二聚体作为预警指标,通过干预手段降低老年CAP患者的并发症及病死率。方法选择2010年1—12月住院确诊CAP〉60岁的老年患者197例,分别测定血浆D-二聚体及C-反应蛋白(CRP)水平;依据肺炎严重度指数(PSI)将患者分为Ⅱ~Ⅴ组,其中Ⅱ、Ⅲ组为低危组,Ⅳ组为中危组,Ⅴ组为高危组,并将患者分为脓毒症组和非脓毒症组;依据影像学改变将患者分为单叶肺炎组和多叶肺炎组。结果Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ3组与Ⅴ组间D-二聚体水平分别为(283.6±111.7)、(508.4±511.7)、(529.6±415.2)、(1014.0±858.7)mg/L,Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ3组与Ⅴ组间比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);低危组、中危组与高危组间D-二聚体水平分别为(438.8±440.7)、(529.6±415.2)、(1014.0±858.7)mg/L,3组间比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);〉80岁组与60~79岁患者组D-二聚体水平分别为(489.2±484.9)、(529.6±415.2)mg/L,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);脓毒症组与非脓毒症组间D-二聚体水平分别为(668.6±651.3)、(478.9±486.6)mg/L,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);单叶肺炎组与多叶肺炎组D-二聚体为(366.6±214.5)、(821.2±429.8)mg/L,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);D-二聚体与PSI呈正相关(r=0.524,P〈0.01);有合并症患者D-二聚体与无合并症者D-二聚体水平分别为(676.6±612.9)、(336.4±232.7)mg/L,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),死亡患者D-二聚体为(1013.4±832.6)mg/L,较前两组水平显著增高(P〈0.05)。结论老年CAP患者D-聚体水平升高,随病情程度加重、年龄增加、肺炎面积扩大及存在合并症,D-二�OBJECTIVE To investigate the correlation between the D-dimer levels and pneumonia severity in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia. And to reduce the complication and mortality in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia by intervention measures using D-dimer as a pre-warning indictor. METHODS A total of 197 elderly CAP patients whose diagnosed age 〉60 in the hospital were selected, and the D-dimer and C-reactive protein levels of them were detected. The Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) was used to clas-sify patients intoⅡ-ⅤVgroups, of which the Ⅱ , Ⅲ group were the low risk group, Ⅳ group was the intermediate risk group, V group was the high risk group. Patients were divided into sepsis and non-sepsis groups, and also divided into lobar and muhilobar groups according to the imageological changes. RESULTS The levels of D-dimer in Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ, Ⅴ groups were (283.6±111.7), (508.4±511.7), (529.6±415.2), (1014. 0±858. 7)mg/L, respectively. There were significant differences between Ⅱ , Ⅲ, Ⅳ and V groups(P〈0.05). The levels of D-dimer in the three different risk groups were respectively (438.8±440.7), (529.6±415.2), (1014.0±858.7) mg/L, and there were significant differences between them (P〈0.01). The D-dimer levels in patients over 80 and 60-79 years old were respectively (489.2±484.9), (529.6±415.2)mg/L, and there were significant differences between two groups (P〈0. 05). The D-dimer levels in sepsis and non sepsis groups were (668. 6±651. 3), (478.9±486.6)mg/L, and there were significant differences between the two groups (P〈0.05). And D-dimer levels in lobar and muhilobar groups were respectively (366. 6±214. 5), (21.2±429.8)mg/L, and there were significant differences between the two groups (P〈0.05). There were positive correlation between D-dimer levels and PSI (r=0. 524, P〈0.01). The D-dimer levels in complication group and non-complication group were(676.6 ±612
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...